Page history
12 May 2023
30 April 2023
28 February 2023
27 February 2023
24 February 2023
→Arms and Armor: reworded for less run-on
m-3
→Gallery
-64
→Arms and Armor
+213
→History
+7
no edit summary
+986
→History: capitalization, link
m+14
comma
mNo, don't just revert that. The Tsaesci in ESO literally have legs so this theory now has no basis at all. They were Tsaesci.
-633
18 February 2023
moving comma
mAfter reviewing Wikipedia, this seems to be the best way to also include the literal translation.
m+27
17 February 2023
15 February 2023
no edit summary
+633
This whole part is completely disproven by them being humanoid, why is it still in there?
-633
22 January 2023
17 January 2023
1 January 2023
30 December 2022
24 December 2022
20 December 2022
12 December 2022
25 October 2022
15 October 2022
22 August 2022
16 August 2022
12 August 2022
Changed order of the sentences.
mChange article content based on the consensus reached in the Talk page. I think.
+1,523
10 August 2022
spacing
m-1
Protected "Lore:Tsaesci (race)": Edit warring ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (expires 01:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only administrators] (expires 01:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)))
mCalling MA and 2920 “fictional literature” is not only bias, it is wholly inaccurate and baseless. “Painted eyes” doesn’t mean they literally “paint their eyes” various colors I’m convinced you don’t understand the sources you are citing
-438
Since when is the Ancestral Akaviri Style book "false sourcing"? Just because you don't like the fact that the Tsaesci are presented as humans doesn't mean you get to claim it's ambigious.
+438
9 August 2022
I will continue to revert to the prior version as long as you continue to misconstrue the sources. "Humanoid in appearance" implies that beast folk can’t have bipedal skeletons. False sourcing
-438
Added more sources on armor, shield, and weapons used
+221
Added source
+65
Considering we have several sources that describes them as human, including a eye-witness account, then it's not biased.
+152
Return to previous, extremely bias edits made with language that implied that they are objectively men and not beastfolk as other sources suggest. Remains an unknown
-152
no edit summary
m+18
The Ancestral Akaviry style book has an eye-witness account from the Tsaesci surrender to Reman at Pale Pass which practically describes them as human or at least humanoid.
+135
no edit summary
m-1
no edit summary
-2
no edit summary
+3
Removed empty paragraph space
m-1
24 June 2022
no edit summary
+427
Going to be doing a little more with this, had to start with this out of the gate as the prior version was wholly inaccurate in claims
-59